Research Method for Engineering Research Students – Part I: A Checklist for Literature Review

//Research Method for Engineering Research Students – Part I: A Checklist for Literature Review

Research Method for Engineering Research Students – Part I: A Checklist for Literature Review

Author:   Sanjay Goel, http://in.linkedin.com/in/sgoel ___________________________________________

This  checklist  can be used by the research students, especially in engineering disciplines,  to carry out the literature review assignments in their research.  However, the  list actually has a much broader scope. It  provides criteria  for reviewing any kind of  technical documents as well as whitepapers. For a  comprehensive checklist about engineering research, interested readers may please refer –   Research Method for Engineering Research Students – Part II: A Checklist for Reflective Self-assessment of the Research Work I invite the learned community of researchers and professional engineers to suggest further improvements to this checklist. ______________________________________ A.   Broad Introduction 1)      Current state of research 2)      List of open and current problems B.   Reference selection for critical review 1)      Clarity of the criteria of selection I.      Relevance criteria wrt to proposed research II.      Quality criteria for selection of references III.      Diversity criteria of approaches    2)      Selection C.   Quality of review of selected sources   1)      For each reference I.            Summary i.             Approach ii.             Method iii.            Result II.            Identification of novelty i.            Problem identification ii.           Problem formulation iii.           Solution a.   Applying a known theory/approach known within a specific discipline in a new context within the same discipline b.   Applying a known theory/approach known within a specific discipline in a new context outside the discipline c.   Theory enhancement/integration/building III.            Validation of results and claims i.            Analytical ii.            Empirical IV.            Your criteria for evaluation of the work V.            Identification of strengths and weaknesses wrt i.            Problem a.   Clarity b.    Significance c.   Relevance d.   Theoretical background and framework e.   Empirical background f.   Assumptions g.   Author’s criteria of claimed strengths ii.            Literature Review  a.  References – Identification of important missing references b.  Critical evaluation of  main references                           iii.            Solution a.    Time/ resource/energy requirement b.    Wastages  and/or Pollution c.    Performance efficiency d.   Consistency, completeness, generality, scalability, open ended-ness, e.     Reliability, elegance, usability, maintainability f.      Safety, health, dignity   iv.            Findings and discovery a.   Evidence b.   Inference, interpretations, theory formulation, conclusions c.   Relevance to your research          2)      Integrated review I.            Consolidation/comparison  with table(s) and/or diagram(s) II.           Potential implications for your research D.      Writing I.            Content oraganisation, Coherent paragraphs, Effective transitions,  citations II.           Tone, clarity,  spelling, punctuation, grammar, style, writing conventions

2017-02-16T06:28:11+00:00 April 16th, 2012|Research Blog|0 Comments

Leave A Comment

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp
X
Your Name
Your Mobile Number
Your E-Mail ID
*All information provided will be kept confidential.
*Terms & Conditions Apply
Your Name
Your Mobile Number
Your E-Mail ID
*All information provided will be kept confidential.
*Terms & Conditions Apply