Literature Review in Research – Research Method for Engineering Students

Literature Review in Research: To explain, this checklist can be used by the research students. Especially in engineering disciplines,  to carry out the literature review assignments in their research. However, the list actually has a much broader scope.  In fact, it provides criteria for reviewing any kind of technical documents. First thing to remember, for a  comprehensive checklist about engineering research, interested readers may please refer

Literature Review in Research for Engineering Research Students

Part II: As a matter of fact, a Checklist for Reflective Self-assessment of the Research Work.  Particularly, I invite the learned communit. In short, researchers and professional engineers. Especially, to suggest further improvements to this checklist.

A.   Broad Introduction

1)    To begin with, the current state of phd research

2)    While, list of open and current problems

B.   Reference selection for critical review

1)      Clarity of the criteria of selection

1. Relevance criteria with respect to research proposal
2. In order to, Quality criteria for selection of references
3. Moreover, diversity criteria of approaches   

2)      Selection

C.   Quality of review of selected sources  

1)      For each reference

1. Approach
2. Method
3. Result

2)     Identification of novelty

1. Problem identification
2. Problem formulation
3. Solution

a.   For this reason, applying a known theory/approach known within a specific disciplin.

b.   In order to, applying a known theory/approach known within a specific discipline in a new context outside the discipline

c.   Theory enhancement/integration/building PHD proposal writing
3)      Validation of results and claims

1. Analytical
2. Empirical

4)     Your criteria for evaluation of the work

5)    Identification of strengths and weaknesses

i.            Problem

1. Henceforth, clarity
2. Significance
3. Relevance
4. Theoretical background and framework
5. Empirical background
6. Assumptions
7. Author’s criteria of claimed strengths

ii.            Literature Review 

1. References – Identification of important missing references
2. Critical evaluation of  main references                          

iii.            Solution

1. First, time/ resource/energy requirement
2. Among, under those circumstances, wastage  and/or Pollution
3. Significantly, performance efficiency
4. In the foreground, consistency, completeness, generality, scalability, and open-mindedness
5. Occasionally, reliability, elegance, usability, maintainability
6. Also, safety, health, dignity  

iv.            Findings and discovery

1. Ultimately, evidence
2. Also, interpretations, theory formulation, conclusions
3. To begin with, relevance to your research          

2)      Integrated review

1. Because the, consolidation/comparison  with table(s) and/or diagram(s)
2. In the center of, the potential implications for your Literature Review

D.      Writing

1. Specifically, content organization, Coherent paragraphs. As well as, Effective transitions,  citations
2. For the purpose of, the tone, clarity,  spelling, Plagiarism Free Writing Services, punctuation. As well as, Grammer Checking, style, writing conventions. Visit us PhDiZone